Welcome, Guest
Username Password:

TOPIC: Links

Re: Links 28 Jun 2012 19:35 #368


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
How many nukes are there around the world? Take a look at this infographic.

More sanctions on Iran start today, then even more on Sunday.

A nice summary of where the Iran negotiations stand, including the points both sides have put forth.

I don't agree with everything in this article, but it's a good perspective on how many different national interests are at play relative to Iran.

Re: Links 02 Jul 2012 23:26 #372


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
News that didn't get enough play today: China will lead talks among the five original nuclear-armed states to define arms control terms. This is really, really important. First, China is taking a significant role where it hasn't been inclined to before. Second, it's bringing all the nuclear weapons nations named in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty together to discuss arms control. Arms control has been the province of the United States and the Soviet Union, then Russia, exclusively. The New START Treaty and the Obama administration have said that the next steps in arms control must involve other nations with nuclear weapons. China probably has the third-largest arsenal.

Is Britain's nuclear arsenal really independent from America's?

Siegfried Hecker, former director of Los Alamos National Laboratory, on why the Comprehensive Test-Ban Treaty is needed.

Gareth Porter on Iran's Parchin test site.

Looks like the US budget could result in fewer nukes.

Re: Links 03 Jul 2012 21:22 #374


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
More about that nuclear powers meeting that China is chairing.

The vehicles that haul nuclear material around the US need to be replaced, and more federal agents are needed to accompany them. (pdf) (h/t to Frank Munger)

I need to read this more carefully, but I think that the American Nuclear Society is saying that providing nuclear fuel services is a good way to keep the more proliferation-supporting parts of the fuel cycle from being attractive to other nations. That's an argument to start up work on nuclear reprocessing again, presumably government funded, since no commercial companies seem to be interested in it.

India is concerned that it may not get into the Nuclear Suppliers' Group.

David Ignatius and his headline writer seem to think that "a breakdown in the Iran nuclear talks" means "we're not going to see complete agreement by the end of this week." There is a somewhat better analysis after the first several paragraphs, but I think that, overall, Ali Vaez makes more sense. Mohammed Ali Shabani thinks that Iran feels that it's got some leverage.

Re: Links 05 Jul 2012 22:23 #377


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Iran made its proposal, presented at this week's technical talks, available to Barbara Slavin, who has made it available to all of us (pdf). Here's her short summary.

Another report of where things stand.

Next week, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will hold a final hearing on a proposal by General Electric (GE) and Hitachi to build the first commercial laser-enrichment plant.

Rosatom approved a technical project for decommissioning of the plutonium production reactors at the Siberian Chemical Combine in Seversk.

Re: Links 11 Jul 2012 21:39 #381


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
A chronic problem of nuclear building is cost overruns. Why does this happen? The overruns have been going on pretty much forever. Do the companies underbid to get the contracts? Are the expectations of all parties unrealistic? These articles don't really say, but they do describe some of the problems.
AP IMPACT: Building costs rise at US nuclear sites
The Mixed-Oxide Fuel Program

The UK government is thinking about selling its share in Urenco?

The US NRC on international safeguards. This explains some of the terms that are used in the discussion of Iran's facilities.

Raytheon wins another big missile defense contract, and the National Academies of Science reply to Congress on some of the problems of missile defense (pdf).

Jeffrey Lewis on the Defense Department's report to Congress on Iran's military power.
Last Edit: 11 Jul 2012 21:40 by Cheryl. Reason: Improve wording.

Re: Links 16 Jul 2012 22:31 #386


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0

Re: Links 18 Jul 2012 22:25 #393


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0

Re: Links 24 Jul 2012 19:15 #398


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
I've been saving them up while we've been offline!

Matthew Wald, NYT: A Low-Key Debut for a New N.R.C. Leader

MarketWatch: AREVA and Northrop Grumman Announce Plans to Provide Cybersecurity Support to U.S. Nuclear Facilities. That would be the same Northrop Grumman that had to shut down its computers because of a security breach last year?

Telluride Daily Planet: Uranium prices too low to sustain mill

Mark Hibbs: Taiwan and the ‘Gold Standard’. The "Gold Standard" is an insistence by the United States on no reprocessing or enrichment by countries with which it shares nuclear technology. Hibbs tells us why Taiwan's acceptance of it doesn't say anything about other countries.

IBN Live: India has 80 to 100 nuclear warheads

Nuclear history: Nuclear missiles on Okinawa during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Japan's nuclear psychology.

If you're interested in following the fiftieth anniversary of the Cuban Missile Crisis, @missilecrisis62 is tweeting daily events.
Last Edit: 24 Jul 2012 19:17 by Cheryl. Reason: Add last link.

Re: Links 31 Jul 2012 22:28 #419


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Last Edit: 31 Jul 2012 22:33 by Cheryl. Reason: Add another link

Re: Links 02 Aug 2012 21:41 #440


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Documents Show Japan Repeatedly Rejected Nuclear Weapons.

The US nuclear terrorism budget.

I linked a government report on nuclear targeting upthread. Here's some analysis.

A photo tour of Manhattan Project sites that are likely to be included in a new national park. Mostly Oak Ridge and Hanford.

Recontextualizing atomic tests. I find this exercise desensitizing, when its objective is the opposite. It reminds me of a Far Side cartoon, which I can't find on line, but here's a photoshopped version.

And a paper from our own Susan Voss on Tracking Nuclear Proliferation within a Commercial Power Program (pdf).

Re: Links 06 Aug 2012 21:10 #464


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Last Edit: 06 Aug 2012 21:12 by Cheryl. Reason: Correct spelling of Fussel

Re: Links 14 Aug 2012 19:09 #572


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
The United States and Iran are not "at war."
The idea that the United States and Iran are locked in a "shadow war" has almost imperceptibly evolved into a new conventional wisdom. But this idea is not only conceptually confusing and historically misleading, it poses a serious risk of normalizing hostile interactions and expectations of conflict.


Iran to File Lawsuits against Cyber Terrorists. Well, good luck with that. Hard to say if this is a bad or good omen for the negotiations.

I occasionally agree with what Iranian government officials have to say. I think that Defense Minister Ahmad Vahidi gets part of this right in referring to Israel's recent bluster:
Their remarks stem from weakness and fear, not their superiority.

The rest of what he says is obviously intended for domestic consumption, but the fact that he's got this nailed might give Israeli officials some pause.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chair Allison Macfarlane's first interview in that post.

The nuclear deal with India, putting a non-signatory of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and holder of nuclear weapons on a similar standing with signatories, isn't panning out for the United States the way President George W. Bush said it would. The problem is a strict-liability law that US private firms can't live with. The largely national-owned French firm Areva and Russian Rosatom can, although Rosatom isn't happy with it.

Long article from the New York Times on how information from the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been the basis for radiation exposure standards, and why it's so difficult to quantify the effects of low-level exposure.

Overhead views of the progress (or lack thereof) on North Korea's light-water reactor.

Re: Links 24 Aug 2012 18:58 #583


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Last Edit: 24 Aug 2012 19:04 by Cheryl. Reason: Add a link

Re: Links 27 Aug 2012 21:37 #587


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Today's big threat is China, according to the New York Times. Gregory Kulacki and Stephen Walt don't think so.

US Diplomatic Efforts Stalled Brazil's Nuclear Program in 1970s. Another country that was investigating the possibility of nuclear weapons. By the 1970s, proliferation was being seen as even more of a danger than in the 1950s, but the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty wasn't as strong as it is today.

The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization says that snap inspections by the IAEA are okay, but then goes on to say that the IAEA must justify each one to Iran's satisfaction. That's not the definition of snap inspections.

Re: Links 02 Sep 2012 22:59 #590


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0

Re: Links 05 Sep 2012 00:27 #595


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0

Re: Links 05 Sep 2012 22:57 #598


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0

Re: Links 10 Sep 2012 22:36 #603


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Bacteria grow in a spent fuel pool. Deinococcus radiodurans is known to be highly resistant to radiation, but it looks like there may be a few more species.

Documents newly declassified on nuclear terrorism.

I would like to know more about the 1957 plutonium fire at Rocky Flats, but I have no confidence in what this article says. I would like to know what the interviewee has used as her sources. She is Kristen Iversen, the author of a new book on the subject: Full Body Burden: Growing Up in the Nuclear Shadow of Rocky Flats. Perhaps the book cites sources. And yes, I'd have the same questions if a DOE official were interviewed and the answers were this glib.
Last Edit: 10 Sep 2012 22:37 by Cheryl. Reason: typo

Re: Links 13 Sep 2012 21:51 #610


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
Looks like the Arab states are trying to move things along toward a conference on a Middle East Nuclear Free Zone.

US statement to the IAEA Board of Governors on Iran. The Board of Governors is meeting this week. Word from Mark Hibbs via @carnegienpp Twitter account is that the resolution on Iran passed. The text should be available soon.

NNSA's warhead dismantlement process.

Re: Links 20 Sep 2012 17:11 #612


  • Posts:300
  • Cheryl
  • Administrator
  • OFFLINE
  • Karma: 0
EPA will begin cleaning up three abandoned uranium mines on the Navajo Reservation.

A physicist who worked on the Manhattan Project and went on to become a lawyer has died at the age of 92.

A British judicial inquiry into the death of Alexander Litvinenko, who is suspected of being poisoned by polonium-210, is scheduled for next year.

Lost and Found: Halliburton is looking for one of its americium well-logging sources and has asked the National Guard to help search.
Last Edit: 20 Sep 2012 17:51 by Cheryl. Reason: Added a link.
Time to create page: 0.84 seconds
You are here: Home Forum